How does fragility show up in the DEI space?
There is a notable presence of gatekeeping by privileged individuals who dominate discussions and initiatives in the DEI space in Denmark. These individuals often control the narrative and access to DEI resources, driven by a fear of losing power to those who might possess more knowledge or different perspectives. This defensiveness manifests as fragility, where they react negatively to criticism or conversations highlighting systemic inequalities. I think that telling uncomfortable truths can cost you friends, especially when you speak about the extraction of minerals and precious metals from Africa whilst the indigenous people live in poverty.
It's just a discussion
If everyone is agreeing with you then you are in an echo chamber and you have just chosen the people to speak to. Controversy is just saying something that someone else just doesn’t agree with. I’m never afraid to speak about any subject that I have knowledge about as I only say things that I believe is fair.
You can book me for workshops, keynote speaking, coaching, DEI trainings or implementation facilitation here.
Are you open to change?
This week I have attended two conferences: “Ethnic Diversity in Danish Journalism Education” at the Danish Media & Journalist High School and “Role Models Will Create the Diversity of the Future” at the Danish Industry headquarters. Yet again it was confirmed that there are double standards bordering on hypocrisy in the Danish culture, as I think integration is a two-way street and the opportunities within DEI are full of cultural blind-spots. I’m fully aware that you cannot be friends with everyone and that whatever point of view you hold, you will upset someone. Why do HR departments in Denmark never have any ethnic minorities in them? Why do DEI consultants who are from minority backgrounds have less access to the job market?